Throughout my childhood, much like everyone else’s childhood, I was an observer, an explorer, a sponge soaking up every phenomenon I saw and subconsciously piecing it all together to make sense of the world around me. I was fortunate to…
Hey undergraduate, your much-awaited final year is finally here! Not too long until you get to the light at the end of the tunnel, eh? According to some humans (mainly graduates), university is the best time of your life. But…
The scientific approach to experimentation aims to be exact: the reproducibility of the experiment is crucial to determining whether the conclusions are accurate. Everything is measured precisely and notes are meticulously taken on how exactly the results came about. To achieve these great heights in scientific reproducibility, the equipment is pretty fan-dangled.
Jack is joined by Matthew Mack to discuss the trouble with teaching maths, the relationship betweens maths and science, and why blockbuster movies don’t feature mad mathematicians. Matthew is a Masters graduate in mathematics attempting to foray into the real world. When he isn’t mentally dissecting or marrying various concepts, he can be found playing the cello or working through a backlog of indie games.
Sarah, Nicola and Jack dive deep into the genetics of homosexuality, why autoimmune diseases aren’t caused by female self-hatred, and why young children love to laugh at everyone else’s misfortune. Plus: a new YAS project in the works, Australian Christmas, hail, and homosexual conversion.
Jack, Joanna and Sarah make a triumphant return to the studio to delve into how protein evolution can help save us from climate change, what the deal is with ebola, and why mantis shrimp are the coolest animals on Earth. Plus: theses, jobs, superhero shows, and nuclear fusion.
For the nineteenth episode of Unfiltered Thoughts, Jack sits down with Bren Carruthers to chat about the big, bad world of journalism, touching on science, climate change and politics.
When asked if the glass of water (or wine, as I prefer to imagine it) is half full or half empty, there has never any doubt in my mind as to the correct answer – it is both at the same time. Is it right to judge the optimist for thinking it half full, or the pessimist for thinking it half empty, given I approach the question from a different (realist) point of view? Of course it is. The mere existence of different beliefs about the nature of the glass of water does not preclude the existence of an objectively correct answer.